ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2023
The design of PINO-like hydrogen-atom-transfer catalysts.
Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lower-temperature bulk depolymerization of commercial polymethacrylates.Nature chemistry · 2026Article
- Fe(III)/Pyridine N-oxide LMCT Photocatalysis for Unactivated C(spACS catalysis · 2026Article
- Photofracking-Assisted Enhancement of Solid-State Photochemical Reactivity: α-Azido-5-phenyl-2,4-dienoate Derivatives.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Asymmetric Hydrogen Atom Transfer.ACS catalysis · 2026Review
- Catalytic photoinduced deoxygenation via B(CNature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Data-Driven Workflow for the Development and Discovery ofACS central science · 2025Article
- Catalyst-Controlled Regiodivergent Oxidation of Unsymmetrical Diols.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Reaction strategies for the meta-selective functionalization of pyridine through dearomatization.Molecular diversity · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phthalimide-N-oxyl (PINO) is a valuable hydrogen-atom-transfer (HAT) catalyst for selective C-H functionalization. To advance and optimize PINO-catalysed HAT reactions, researchers have been focused on modifying the phthalimide core structure. Despite much effort and some notable advances, the modifications to date have centred on optimization of a single parameter of the catalyst, such as reactivity, solubility or stability. Unfortunately, the optimization with respect to one parameter is often associated with a worsening of the others. The derivation of a single catalyst structure with optimal performance across multiple parameters has therefore remained elusive. Here we present an analysis of the structure-activity relationships of PINO and its derivatives as HAT catalysts, which we hope will stimulate further development of PINO-catalysed HAT reactions and, ultimately, lead to much improved catalysts for real-world applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.