Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37464003›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Learning from algorithm-generated pseudo-annotations for detecting ants in videos.

Yizhe Zhang, Natalie Imirzian, Christoph Kurze, Hao Zheng, David P Hughes, Danny Z Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yizhe ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China. zhangyizhe@njust.edu.cn.
Natalie ImirzianDepartment of Entomology and Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Christoph KurzeDepartment of Entomology and Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Hao ZhengDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
David P HughesDepartment of Entomology and Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Danny Z ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.

Funding

From Cells to Societies: Mechanisms by Which Microbial Parasites Control Host PhenotypesR01GM116927 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI CHEN, DANNY ZIYI, HANKS, EPHRAIM · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) based detection models are powerful tools for large-scale analysis of dynamic biological behaviors in video data. Supervised training of a DL detection model often requires a large amount of manually-labeled training data which are time-consuming and labor-intensive to acquire. In this paper, we propose LFAGPA (Learn From Algorithm-Generated Pseudo-Annotations) that utilizes (noisy) annotations which are automatically generated by algorithms to train DL models for ant detection in videos. Our method consists of two main steps: (1) generate foreground objects using a (set of) state-of-the-art foreground extraction algorithm(s); (2) treat the results from step (1) as pseudo-annotations and use them to train deep neural networks for ant detection. We tackle several challenges on how to make use of automatically generated noisy annotations, how to learn from multiple annotation resources, and how to combine algorithm-generated annotations with human-labeled annotations (when available) for this learning framework. In experiments, we evaluate our method using 82 videos (totally 20,348 image frames) captured under natural conditions in a tropical rain-forest for dynamic ant behavior study. Without any manual annotation cost but only algorithm-generated annotations, our method can achieve a decent detection performance (77% in [Formula: see text] score). Moreover, when using only 10% manual annotations, our method can train a DL model to perform as well as using the full human annotations (81% in [Formula: see text] score).

Indexed as

AntsAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID37464003
PMCPMC10354180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.