ArticleScientific reports2023
Indoor particle dispersion due to hand dryer in public washroom: an in silico study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand dryer in public washroom has been reported likely to be a reservoir of drug-resistant bacteria. When a hand dryer being used, the high-velocity air jet from the dryer outlet can carry aerosol particles to hand surfaces, the user, and indoor space. This in silico study considered the effect of different airflow speed of hand dryers on the dispersion of particles in different diameters with and without the user. The aim of this study was to apply the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method based on the discrete phase model to investigate the trajectory of indoor particles from the hand dryer in public washroom. The CFD results showed that, when the user was using the hand dryer, 42.3% of the particles were distributed on the wall against the user, and 31.6% were distributed on the user's body, including their hands. When no one was standing in front of the hand dryer, 87.6% of the particles fell on the ground. The blocking of user's hand dispersed the particles to a wide range, particularly for the larger diameter particles which were scattered on the user's body or on the ground. In addition, the dispersion proportion of particles did not vary with the speed of airflow, but the area of particles distribution became larger as the speed increased. Our findings suggest that the contamination of the indoor environment caused by the hand dryer could not be ignored, incorporating filters into hand dryers is essential. Furthermore, our work offers valuable insights for optimizing the design of hand dryers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.