Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37463720›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2023

Dementia care coordinator service in Kent and Medway: a realist evaluation protocol.

Ruth Abrams, Heather Gage, Jill Maben, Wendy Grosvenor, Kath Sykes, Morro Touray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruth AbramsUniversity of Surrey, Kate Granger Building, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, UK r.abrams@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2974-7859
Heather GageDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Surrey Health Economics Centre, Leggett Building, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2049-9406
Jill MabenUniversity of Surrey, Kate Granger Building, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6168-0455
Wendy GrosvenorUniversity of Surrey, Kate Granger Building, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5529-7022
Kath SykesApplied Research Collaboration/Academic Health Science Network, Beehive, Gatwick, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6677-7731
Morro TourayDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Surrey Health Economics Centre, Leggett Building, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1509-6194
University of Surrey · GBEducation and Research Network · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia care is a key priority for both NHS England and the UK government. National guidelines highlight the importance of care coordination to address the challenges people living with dementia and their carers can encounter when trying to access the health and care system. To counter these challenges, Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board (ICB) have recently implemented a proactive dementia care coordinator (DCC) service to support people with dementia and their carers from pre-diagnosis to end-of-life care.

aimTo understand how the DCC service works (or does not work), for whom, and in what circumstances. The findings will inform service development and future investment decisions. DESIGN &

settingThis study will use a realist approach to evaluate the DCC service in Kent and Medway ICB, south-east England, which has a population of 1.9 million, comprising 42 primary care networks (PCNs; groups of general practices) each having a DCC.

methodAn initial programme theory will be developed from existing literature, and in collaboration with stakeholders. Mixed methods, including questionnaires to DCCs, service provider metrics, and qualitative interviews, will be used to collect data on service provider and service user experiences. Interpretive comparative analysis and narrative synthesis, including evaluation of service costs against outcomes, will produce a refined final programme theory.

resultsThe results from this project will produce evidence-based recommendations to help improve service delivery and possible service expansion.

conclusionThis protocol describes a realist evaluation designed to investigate the recently implemented DCC service in Kent and Medway ICB.

Indexed as

dementiageneral practiceprimary health carerealist approachrole implementationservice designservice evaluation

Identifiers

PMID37463720
PMCPMC11176706
OpenAlexW4384663312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.