ArticleMedical education online2023
Understanding medical professionalism using express team-based learning; a qualitative case-based study.
Article in Medical education online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes of team based learning in teaching medical ethics: a systematic review.BMC medical ethics · 2025Pooled it
- Role of self-regulated learning in a communication skills curriculum: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- PROfessionalism in Partnership for Education Research (PROPER) study: a novel online initiative approach to professionalism education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Endless justification: A scoping review of team-based learning research in medical education.Medical education · 2026Article
- Medical Students' Reflections on Transitioning to Their First General Practice Placement: Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Enhancing academic engagement through online team-based learning: a longitudinal study in nursing education.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Shades of acceptance and adjustment; a discursive psychological analysis to showcase empathy in medical students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Unfolding insights about resilience and its coping strategies by medical academics and healthcare professionals at their workplaces: a thematic qualitative analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Impact of case-based learning on critical thinking dispositions in Chinese nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- A podcast to teach medical humanities at medical school: a text-mining study of students' lived experience.Medical education online · 2024Article
- Empowering Nurse Health Education: Linguistic and Cultural Validation of the Nurse Health Education Competence Instrument (NHECI) in the Italian Context.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Professionalism-training in undergraduate medical education in a multi-cultural, multi-ethnic setting in the Gulf Region: an exploration of reflective essays.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- "Busting the hidden curriculum" a realist and innovative perspective to foster professional behaviors.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Validating a theory of planned behavior questionnaire for assessing changes in professional behaviors of medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Letter to the editor regarding the article "understanding medical professionalism using express team-based learning; a qualitative case-based study".Medical education online · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical Professionalism (MP) defined as values, behaviours and attitudes that promote professional relationships, public trust and patient safety is a vital competency in health profession education. MP has a distinctive uniqueness due to cultural, contextual, conceptual, and generational variations. There is no standard instructional strategy to probe the understanding of MP in a cohesive, structured, interactive manner. This study aimed to investigate undergraduate medical students' understanding of MP using express team-based learning (e-TBL) at both campuses of Royal College of Surgeons Ireland (RCSI). Using the key principles of a sociocultural theoretical lens in adult learning theory, we designed e-TBL as a context-learning-based educational strategy. We conducted three e-TBL sessions on cross-cultural communication and health disparities, a reflective report on clinical encounters, and professionalism in practice. We collected, collated, and analyzed the student experiences qualitatively using data gathered from team-based case discussions during e-TBL sessions. A dedicated working group developed very short-answer questions for the individual readiness assurance test (IRAT) and MP-based case scenarios for team discussions. In this adapted 4-step e-TBL session, pre-class material was administered, IRAT was undertaken, and team-based discussions were facilitated, followed by facilitator feedback. A qualitative inductive thematic analysis was performed, which generated subthemes and themes illustrated in excerpts. Our thematic analysis of data from 172 students (101 from Bahrain and 71 from Dublin) yielded four unique themes: incoming professional attitudes, transformative experiences, sociological understanding of professionalism, and new professional identity formation. This qualitative study provides a deeper understanding of medical students' perceptions of medical professionalism. The generated themes resonated with divergent and evolving elements of MP in an era of socioeconomic and cultural diversity, transformative experiences, and professional identity formation. The core elements of these themes can be integrated into the teaching of MP to prepare fit-to-practice future doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.