Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37463164›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Usability of pulse oximeters used by community health and primary care workers as screening tools for severe illness in children under five in low resource settings: A cross-sectional study in Cambodia, Ethiopia, South Sudan, and Uganda.

Theresa Pfurtscheller, Kevin Baker, Tedila Habte, Kévin Lasmi, Lena Matata, Akasiima Mucunguzi, Jill Nicholson, Anthony Nuwa, Max Petzold, Mónica Posada González and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Theresa PfurtschellerDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-9790
Kevin BakerDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Tedila HabteMalaria Consortium Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kévin LasmiDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Lena MatataSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6784-0264
Akasiima MucunguziMalaria Consortium Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Jill NicholsonMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony NuwaMalaria Consortium Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Max PetzoldSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4908-2169
Mónica Posada GonzálezMalaria Consortium Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Anteneh SebsibeMalaria Consortium Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tobias AlfvénDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Karin KällanderDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Malaria Consortium · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEMalaria Consortium · UGCambodia National Malaria Center · KHSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely recognition and referral of severely ill children is especially critical in low-resource health systems. Pulse-oximeters can improve health outcomes of children by detecting hypoxaemia, a severity indicator of the most common causes of death in children. Cost-effectiveness of pulse-oximeters has been proven in low-income settings. However, evidence on their usability in community health settings is scarce.This study explores the usability of pulse-oximeters for community health and primary care workers in Cambodia, Ethiopia, South Sudan, and Uganda. We collected observational data, through a nine-task checklist, and survey data, using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire, capturing three usability aspects (effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction) of single-probe fingertip and multi-probe handheld devices. Effectiveness was determined by checklist completion rates and task completion rates per checklist item. Efficiency was reported as proportion of successful assessments within three attempts. Standardized summated questionnaire scores (min = 0, max = 100) determined health worker's satisfaction. Influencing factors on effectiveness and satisfaction were explored through hypothesis tests between independent groups (device type, cadre of health worker, country). Checklist completion rate was 78.3% [CI 72.6-83.0]. Choosing probes according to child age showed the lowest task completion rate of 68.7% [CI 60.3%-76.0%]. In 95.6% [CI 92.7%-97.4%] of assessments a reading was obtained within three attempts. The median satisfaction score was 95.6 [IQR = 92.2-99.0]. Significantly higher checklist completion rates were observed with single-probe fingertip devices (p<0.001) and children 12-59 months (p<0.001). We found higher satisfaction scores in South Sudan (p<0.001) and satisfaction varied slightly between devices. From a usability perspective single-probe devices for all age groups should be prioritized for scaled implementation. Further research on easy to use and accurate devices for infants is much needed.

Identifiers

PMID37463164
PMCPMC10353789
OpenAlexW4384664998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.