Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37463156›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Monte Carlo samplers for efficient network inference.

Zeliha Kilic, Max Schweiger, Camille Moyer, Steve Pressé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zeliha KilicDepartment of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3287-9561
Max SchweigerCenter for Biological Physics, ASU, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Camille MoyerCenter for Biological Physics, ASU, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Steve PresséDepartment of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5408-0718

Funding

Toward high spatiotemporal resolution models of single molecules for in vivo applicationsR35GM148237 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Steve Presse · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
A Bayesian nonparametric approach to superresolved tracking of multiple molecules inside living cellsR01GM130745 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Theoretical Models of Single Molecule Dynamics from Minimal Photon NumbersR01GM134426 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130745NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134426NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accessing information on an underlying network driving a biological process often involves interrupting the process and collecting snapshot data. When snapshot data are stochastic, the data's structure necessitates a probabilistic description to infer underlying reaction networks. As an example, we may imagine wanting to learn gene state networks from the type of data collected in single molecule RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (RNA-FISH). In the networks we consider, nodes represent network states, and edges represent biochemical reaction rates linking states. Simultaneously estimating the number of nodes and constituent parameters from snapshot data remains a challenging task in part on account of data uncertainty and timescale separations between kinetic parameters mediating the network. While parametric Bayesian methods learn parameters given a network structure (with known node numbers) with rigorously propagated measurement uncertainty, learning the number of nodes and parameters with potentially large timescale separations remain open questions. Here, we propose a Bayesian nonparametric framework and describe a hybrid Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampler directly addressing these challenges. In particular, in our hybrid method, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) leverages local posterior geometries in inference to explore the parameter space; Adaptive Metropolis Hastings (AMH) learns correlations between plausible parameter sets to efficiently propose probable models; and Parallel Tempering takes into account multiple models simultaneously with tempered information content to augment sampling efficiency. We apply our method to synthetic data mimicking single molecule RNA-FISH, a popular snapshot method in probing transcriptional networks to illustrate the identified challenges inherent to learning dynamical models from these snapshots and how our method addresses them.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsRNABayes TheoremIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodRNA

Identifiers

PMID37463156
PMCPMC10353823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.