ArticleAnnals of neurology2023
Measuring Sentence Information via Surprisal: Theoretical and Clinical Implications in Nonfluent Aphasia.
Article in Annals of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surprisal from Large Language Models as an individual difference: Capturing the individual regardless of the text answer.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Evaluating the utility of large language models for detecting and simulating language dysfunction.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Computational Sentence-Level Metrics of Reading Speed and Its Ramifications for Sentence Comprehension.Cognitive science · 2025Article
- Data-driven classification of narrative speech characteristics in stroke aphasia distinguishes neurological and strategic contributions.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025Article
- Tracking priming-induced language recovery in aphasia with pre-trained language models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Language abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease indicate reduced informativeness.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence classifies primary progressive aphasia from connected speech.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Clinical efficacy of pre-trained large language models through the lens of aphasia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impaired language in Alzheimer's disease: A comparison between English and Persian implicates content-word frequency rather than the noun-verb distinction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Language uncovers visuospatial dysfunction in posterior cortical atrophy: a natural language processing approach.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Using Generative Artificial Intelligence to Classify Primary Progressive Aphasia from Connected Speech.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNonfluent aphasia is characterized by simplified sentence structures and word-level abnormalities, including reduced use of verbs and function words. The predominant belief about the disease mechanism is that a core deficit in syntax processing causes both structural and word-level abnormalities. Here, we propose an alternative view based on information theory to explain the symptoms of nonfluent aphasia. We hypothesize that the word-level features of nonfluency constitute a distinct compensatory process to augment the information content of sentences to the level of healthy speakers. We refer to this process as lexical condensation.
methodsWe use a computational approach based on language models to measure sentence information through surprisal, a metric calculated by the average probability of occurrence of words in a sentence, given their preceding context. We apply this method to the language of patients with nonfluent primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA; n = 36) and healthy controls (n = 133) as they describe a picture.
resultsWe found that nfvPPA patients produced sentences with the same sentence surprisal as healthy controls by using richer words in their structurally impoverished sentences. Furthermore, higher surprisal in nfvPPA sentences correlated with the canonical features of agrammatism: a lower function-to-all-word ratio, a lower verb-to-noun ratio, a higher heavy-to-all-verb ratio, and a higher ratio of verbs in -ing forms.
interpretationUsing surprisal enables testing an alternative account of nonfluent aphasia that regards its word-level features as adaptive, rather than defective, symptoms, a finding that would call for revisions in the therapeutic approach to nonfluent language production. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:647-657.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.