Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37463037›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2023

Impact of Anti-EGFR Therapies on HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Tanios S Bekaii-Saab, Krzysztof Lach, Ling-I Hsu, Muriel Siadak, Mike Stecher, James Ward, Rachel Beckerman, John H Strickler

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. HER2-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Colon Cancer: New Frontiers.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanios S Bekaii-SaabDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7721-1699
Krzysztof LachMaple Health Group, LLC, New York, NY, USA.
Ling-I HsuSeagen Inc., Bothell, WA, USA.
Muriel SiadakSeagen Inc., Bothell, WA, USA.
Mike StecherSeagen Inc., Bothell, WA, USA.
James WardSeagen Inc., Bothell, WA, USA.
Rachel BeckermanMaple Health Group, LLC, New York, NY, USA.
John H StricklerDivision of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7579-1175
Seagen (United States) · USDuke Medical Center · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may be associated with resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR therapies. Given the lack of comprehensive investigations into this association, we assessed the prognostic or predictive effect of HER2 amplification/overexpression on anti-EGFR treatment outcomes.

methodsA systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library (2001-2021) identified studies evaluating progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR treatments and whose HER2 status was known. Meta-analyses of proportions (ORR) and hazard ratios (PFS, OS) were performed using random-effect models with pre-specified sensitivity analyses.

resultsFive high-quality retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analyses representing 594 patients with mCRC. All patients received anti-EGFR treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis of PFS demonstrated a 2.84-fold higher risk of death or progression (95% CI, 1.44-5.60) in patients with HER2-positive (vs. HER2-negative) RAS WT mCRC treated with anti-EGFR regimens. The odds of response to anti-EGFR treatment were 2-fold higher in HER2-negative vs. HER2-positive (odds ratio, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.10-3.48]). Differences in OS were not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case estimates.

conclusionsWhile this study could not account for all confounding factors, in patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy, HER2 overexpression/amplification was associated with worse PFS and ORR and may therefore predict poorer outcomes. HER2 testing is important to inform treatment decisions and could optimize outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErbB ReceptorsHumansPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalErbB ReceptorsPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)epidermal growth factor receptorhuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2meta-analysismetastatic colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37463037
PMCPMC10546818
OpenAlexW4384625387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.