Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37463008›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Perceived Impact of Digital Health Maturity on Patient Experience, Population Health, Health Care Costs, and Provider Experience: Mixed Methods Case Study.

Leanna Woods, Ronald Dendere, Rebekah Eden, Brittany Grantham, Jenna Krivit, Andrew Pearce, Keith McNeil, Damian Green, Clair Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leanna WoodsCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4811-4608
Ronald DendereCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7341-3098
Rebekah EdenUQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6228-7241
Brittany GranthamCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-0498-3075
Jenna KrivitCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-4256-860X
Andrew PearceHealthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0001-4697-9459
Keith McNeilQueensland Digital Health Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4805-7420
Damian GreeneHealth Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-1487-5814
Clair SullivanCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2475-9989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care organizations understand the importance of new technology implementations; however, the best strategy for implementing successful digital transformations is often unclear. Digital health maturity assessments allow providers to understand the progress made toward technology-enhanced health service delivery. Existing models have been criticized for their lack of depth and breadth because of their technology focus and neglect of meaningful outcomes.

objectiveWe aimed to examine the perceived impacts of digital health reported by health care staff employed in health care organizations across a spectrum of digital health maturity.

methodsA mixed methods case study was conducted. The digital health maturity of public health care systems (n=16) in Queensland, Australia, was examined using the quantitative Digital Health Indicator (DHI) self-assessment survey. The lower and upper quartiles of DHI scores were calculated and used to stratify sites into 3 groups. Using qualitative methods, health care staff (n=154) participated in interviews and focus groups. Transcripts were analyzed assisted by automated text-mining software. Impacts were grouped according to the digital maturity of the health care worker's facility and mapped to the quadruple aims of health care: improved patient experience, improved population health, reduced health care cost, and enhanced provider experience.

resultsDHI scores ranged between 78 and 193 for the 16 health care systems. Health care systems in the high-maturity category (n=4, 25%) had a DHI score of ≥166.75 (the upper quartile); low-maturity sites (n=4, 25%) had a DHI score of ≤116.75 (the lower quartile); and intermediate-maturity sites (n=8, 50%) had a DHI score ranging from 116.75 to 166.75 (IQR). Overall, 18 perceived impacts were identified. Generally, a greater number of positive impacts were reported in health care systems of higher digital health maturity. For patient experiences, higher maturity was associated with maintaining a patient health record and tracking patient experience data, while telehealth enabled access and flexibility across all digital health maturity categories. For population health, patient journey tracking and clinical risk mitigation were reported as positive impacts at higher-maturity sites, and telehealth enabled health care access and efficiencies across all maturity categories. Limited interoperability and organizational factors (eg, strategy, policy, and vision) were universally negative impacts affecting health service delivery. For health care costs, the resource burden of ongoing investments in digital health and a sustainable skilled workforce was reported. For provider experiences, the negative impacts of poor usability and change fatigue were universal, while network and infrastructure issues were negative impacts at low-maturity sites.

conclusionsThis is one of the first studies to show differences in the perceived impacts of digital maturity of health care systems at scale. Higher digital health maturity was associated with more positive reported impacts, most notably in achieving outcomes for the population health aim.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareTelemedicineHealth Care CostsHealth ServicesHumansPatient Outcome Assessmentdigital healthdigital hospitaldigital maturityevaluation studyhealth information systemshealth services researchimpactoutcome assessmentqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37463008
PMCPMC10394505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.