Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37462890›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2024

Applying the HIV Prevention Cascade to an Evaluation of a Large-Scale Combination HIV Prevention Programme for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in South Africa.

Kate Bergh, Elona Toska, Zoe Duby, Darshini Govindasamy, Catherine Mathews, Tarylee Reddy, Kim Jonas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kate BerghHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zijl Dr, Parrow Valley, Cape Town, 7501, South Africa. katebergh@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5471-5819
Elona ToskaDepartment of Sociology, Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Zoe DubyHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zijl Dr, Parrow Valley, Cape Town, 7501, South Africa.
Darshini GovindasamyHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zijl Dr, Parrow Valley, Cape Town, 7501, South Africa.
Catherine MathewsHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zijl Dr, Parrow Valley, Cape Town, 7501, South Africa.
Tarylee ReddyBiostatistics Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Kim JonasHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zijl Dr, Parrow Valley, Cape Town, 7501, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in South Africa are at a three times higher risk of acquiring HIV than their male counterparts. The HIV prevention cascade is a tool which can be used to measure coverage of HIV prevention services, although there is limited empirical evidence to demonstrate its application in low-resourced settings. The unifying framework is a conceptualisation of the HIV prevention cascade which theorises that both motivation and access are required for an individual to effectively use an HIV prevention method. We applied this framework to data from a random sample of 127,951 beneficiaries of a combination HIV prevention programme for AGYW aged 15-24 in South Africa to measure the steps to, and identify key barriers to, effective use of male condoms and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among this vulnerable population. Barriers to each step were analysed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Among self-reported HIV-negative AGYW who had sex in the past 6 months, effective use of condoms (15.2%), access to PrEP (39.1%) and use of PrEP (3.8%) were low. AGYW were: less likely to be motivated to use condoms if they believed that they had a faithful partner (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.90) or disliked condoms (aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.57), less likely to access condoms if the place where AGYW accessed them was far away (aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10-0.64), more likely to effectively use condoms if they received counselling on how to use them (aOR 2.24, 95% CI 1.05-4.76), less likely to be motivated to use PrEP if they did not believe PrEP was efficacious (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.72), more likely to be motivated if they felt confident that they could use PrEP, and more likely to have access to PrEP if they had ever been offered PrEP (aOR 2.94, 95% CI 1.19-7.22). This combination HIV prevention programme and similar programmes should focus on risk-reduction counselling interventions for AGYW and their male partners to improve effective use of condoms and ensure easy access to condoms and PrEP by making them available in youth-friendly spaces. Our findings demonstrate that the application of HIV prevention cascades can inform AGYW HIV prevention programming in low-resourced settings.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentCondomsFemaleHumansMaleMotivationSouth AfricaAnti-HIV AgentsAdolescent girls and young womenCondomsHIV prevention cascadesPrEPSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID37462890
PMCPMC10940416
OpenAlexW4384627182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.