ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023
Generating missing patient anatomy from partially acquired cone-beam computed tomography images using deep learning: a proof of concept.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Image quality enhancement of small field-of-view cone-beam CT for image-guided radiotherapy using a structure-preserving cycle-consistent generative adversarial network.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Improved synthetic CT generation using surface scan information integrated into a deformable registration algorithm for limited Field of View data.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Novel extended field-of-view reconstruction algorithms in computed tomography simulation for imaging and volumetric modulated arc therapy dosimetry.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Machine learning for classification of periodontal defects (vertical versus horizontal) using CBCT datasets.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Generation of tissues outside the field of view (FOV) of radiation therapy simulation imaging based on machine learning and patient body outline (PBO).Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The patient setup technique currently in practice in most radiotherapy departments utilises on-couch cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. Patients are positioned on the treatment couch using visual markers, followed by fine adjustments to the treatment couch position depending on the shift observed between the computed tomography (CT) image acquired for treatment planning and the CBCT image acquired immediately before commencing treatment. The field of view of CBCT images is limited to the size of the kV imager which leads to the acquisition of partial CBCT scans for lateralised tumors. The cone-beam geometry results in high amounts of streaking artifacts and in conjunction with limited anatomical information reduces the registration accuracy between planning CT and the CBCT image. This study proposes a methodology that can improve radiotherapy patient setup CBCT images by removing streaking artifacts and generating the missing patient anatomy with patient-specific precision. This research was split into two separate studies. In Study A, synthetic CBCT (sCBCT) data was created and used to train two machine learning models, one for removing streaking artifacts and the other for generating the missing patient anatomy. In Study B, planning CT and on-couch CBCT data from several patients was used to train a base model, from which a transfer of learning was performed using imagery from a single patient, producing a patient-specific model. The models developed for Study A performed well at removing streaking artifacts and generating the missing anatomy. The outputs yielded in Study B show that the model understands the individual patient and can generate the missing anatomy from partial CBCT datasets. The outputs generated demonstrate that there is utility in the proposed methodology which could improve the patient setup and ultimately lead to improving overall treatment quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.