Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37462830›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2023

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients.

François Barbier, Sami Hraiech, Solen Kernéis, Nathanaël Veluppillai, Olivier Pajot, Julien Poissy, Damien Roux, Jean-Ralph Zahar, French Intensive Care Society

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

François BarbierMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, 14, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 45000, Orléans, France. francois.barbier@chr-orleans.fr.
Sami HraiechMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, and Centre d'Études et de Recherche sur les Services de Santé et la Qualité de Vie, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France.
Solen KernéisÉquipe de Prévention du Risque Infectieux, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, and INSERM/IAME, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Nathanaël VeluppillaiÉquipe de Prévention du Risque Infectieux, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, and INSERM/IAME, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Olivier PajotRéanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Victor Dupouy, Argenteuil, France.
Julien PoissyMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Inserm U1285, Université de Lille, and CNRS/UMR 8576 - UGSF - Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France.
Damien RouxInstitut Maurice Rapin, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Jean-Ralph ZaharInstitut Maurice Rapin, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
French Intensive Care Society
Centre hospitalier régional d'Orléans · FRCentre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Avicenne · FRHôpital Nord · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

methodsA systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

resultsThese drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

conclusionsNew BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

AztreonamCarbapenem resistanceCefiderocolCeftazidime–avibactamCeftolozane–tazobactamEnterobacteralesImipenem–relebactamIntensive care unitMeropenem–vaborbactamPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID37462830
PMCPMC10354316
OpenAlexW4384627177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.