Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37462742›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

General classification of rhinopaties: the need for standardization according to etiology and nasal cytology.

M Gelardi, V Fiore, R Giancaspro, F M Di Canio, C Fiorentino, S Patruno, A Ruzza, M Cassano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M GelardiUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Via Luigi Pinto 1, 71122, Foggia, Italy.
V FioreUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Via Luigi Pinto 1, 71122, Foggia, Italy.
R GiancasproUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Via Luigi Pinto 1, 71122, Foggia, Italy. rogianca@live.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5082-7271
F M Di CanioUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Via Luigi Pinto 1, 71122, Foggia, Italy.
C FiorentinoUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Via Luigi Pinto 1, 71122, Foggia, Italy.
S PatrunoUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Via Luigi Pinto 1, 71122, Foggia, Italy.
A RuzzaUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Via Luigi Pinto 1, 71122, Foggia, Italy.
M CassanoUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Via Luigi Pinto 1, 71122, Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRhinitis is as an inflammation of the nasal mucosa, characterized by high prevalence, widespread morbidity, and a significant financial burden on health care systems. Nevertheless, it is often considered as no more than a mere annoyance. This point of view has progressively led to underestimate and trivialize the disease. Therefore, there are numerous, mostly overlapping classifications of rhinopaties, but clear and standardized guidelines for diagnosis and treatment are still lacking. In the context of Precision Medicine, the development of a classification system focused on the endotypes of rhinitis to be widely adopted appears of utmost importance, also by virtue of study of the nasal immunophlogosis that, thanks to nasal cytology (NC), has recently allowed to better define the different forms of rhinitis, giving a new nosological dignity to several rhinopaties.

aimWe aimed to summarize the current knowledge regarding rhinitis and to propose a systematic classification of rhinitis, based on both etiology and cytological findings.

Indexed as

RhinitisHumansInflammationNasal MucosaReference StandardsAllergic rhinitisClassification of rhinopathiesNasal cytologyRhinitisRhinopathiesVasomotor rhinitis

Identifiers

PMID37462742
PMCPMC10562500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.