Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37462684›Full record

ArticleHNO2023

Structure and establishment of the German Cochlear Implant Registry (DCIR).

T Stöver, S K Plontke, O Guntinas-Lichius, H-J Welkoborsky, T Zahnert, K W Delank, T Deitmer, D Esser, A Dietz, A Wienke and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The German cochlear implant registry: one year experience and first results on demographic data.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

T StöverDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. timo.stoever@kgu.de.
S K PlontkeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany.
O Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
H-J WelkoborskyHospital for Otorhinolaryngology, Klinikum Nordstadt, Hanover, Germany.
T ZahnertDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Dresden University Hospital, Dresden, Germany.
K W DelankDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ludwigshafen Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
T Deitmer
D Esser
A DietzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
A WienkeLaw office WBK, lawyer specialist medical law, Cologne, Germany.
A LothDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
S DazertDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital (St. Elisabeth Hospital), Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing rehabilitation of patients with severe hearing loss or deafness using cochlear implants (CI) is a very successful but also complex and lifelong process that requires high quality standards for structure, process, and results. Medical registries represent an ideal tool for conducting quality control relevant to care while at the same time collecting scientific data. Therefore, at the initiative of the Executive Committee of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), a Germany-wide CI registry (the German Cochlear Implant Register, DCIR) was to be established. The following goals were to be achieved: 1) legal and contractual basis for the register; 2) definition of the register contents; 3) development of evaluation standards (hospital-specific and national annual reports); 4) development of a logo; 5) practical operation of the registry. After defining a catalog of services that defines the content, structure, and operation of the DCIR, a registry operator with audiological expertise was sought. After considering various offers, the registry was technically implemented in cooperation with the provider INNOFORCE (Ruggell, Liechtenstein) as registry operator. This also included the realization of an interface for data transfer from previously existing databases and development of a data protection concept for productive operation of the DCIR under the scientific leadership of the DGHNO-KHC Executive Committee. Since January 2022, it has been possible for participating hospitals to enter pseudonymized data into the DCIR. To date, 75 hospitals in Germany have contractually agreed to participate in the registry. During the first 15 months, data from over 2500 implants in over 2000 patients were registered in the DCIR. The work presented here describes the structuring, development, and successful establishment of the DCIR. Introduction of the DCIR represents an important milestone of future scientifically based quality control in CI care. The registry presented here can therefore be considered as an example for other areas of medical care and thus also sets an international standard.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing LossOtolaryngologyGermanyHumansRegistriesCertificationImplantable neurostimulatorsProstheses and implantsQuality controlRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37462684
PMCPMC10409674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.