ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2023
Perspectives of Community Partners Involved in an Academic Training to Address Clinicians' Implicit Bias.
Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03375918 (COmmuNity-engaged SimULation Training for Blood Pressure Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COmmuNity-engaged SimULation Training for Blood Pressure Control
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community perspectives on partnering with early-stage investigators in pilot research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Community Partners' Perceptions of the Benefits and Burdens of Participating in a Community Engagement Course with Medical Students.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Design and implementation of the 6-C model of community engagement.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-academic partnerships are increasingly used in interventions to address health care disparities. Little is known about motivations and perceptions of participating community members.
objectivesTo elicit community members' perspectives of involvement in a community-academic partnership to address implicit bias in health care.
methodsWith our partnering community organizer, we conducted one-on-one semistructured interviews and a follow-up group interview with participating community members to solicit experiences about involvement in an National Institutes of Health-funded clinician training; responses were organized using content analysis.
resultsCommunity members revealed that their participation was motivated by trust in our community organizer; they derived personal pride from participation in clinician training; the power differential between community members and clinicians in the training environment needed to be levelled. Our community organizer noted that the benefits of community-academic partnerships propagate to the larger community via community members' experiences.
conclusionsCommunity members note trust, pride, and power as important elements in community-academic partnership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.