Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37462203›Full record

ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2023

Learning how to reason and deciding when to decide.

Senne Braem, Leslie Held, Amitai Shenhav, Romy Frömer

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Senne BraemDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium senne.braem@ugent.be; https://users.ugent.be/~sbraem/ leslie.held@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0002-2619-8225
Leslie HeldDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium senne.braem@ugent.be; https://users.ugent.be/~sbraem/ leslie.held@ugent.be.
Amitai ShenhavDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA amitai_shenhav@brown.edu; https://www.shenhavlab.org.
Romy FrömerDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA amitai_shenhav@brown.edu; https://www.shenhavlab.org.

Funding

Neural and computational mechanisms of motivation and cognitive controlR01MH124849 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SHENHAV, AMITAI · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on human reasoning has both popularized and struggled with the idea that intuitive and deliberate thoughts stem from two different systems, raising the question how people switch between them. Inspired by research on cognitive control and conflict monitoring, we argue that detecting the need for further thought relies on an intuitive, context-sensitive process that is learned in itself.

Indexed as

LearningProblem SolvingHumans

Identifiers

PMID37462203
PMCPMC10597599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.