Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37462177›Full record

ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2023

Illusory intuitions: Challenging the claim of non-exclusivity.

Simon J Handley, Omid Ghasemi, Michal Bialek

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon J HandleySchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia simon.handley@mq.edu.auhttps://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/persons/simon-handley.ORCID 0000-0003-4404-7452
Omid GhasemiSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia o.ghasemi@unsw.edu.auhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=LyL_5s8AAAAJ&hl=en.ORCID 0000-0001-7511-5580
Michal BialekInstitute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wrocław, Poland michal.bialek3@uwr.edu.plhttps://sites.google.com/view/michalbialek.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A person who arrives at correct solutions via false premises is right and wrong simultaneously. Similarly, a person who generates "logical intuitions" through superficial heuristics can likewise be right and wrong at the same time. However, heuristics aren't guaranteed to deliver the logical solution, so the claim that system 1 can routinely produce the alleged system 2 response is unfounded.

Indexed as

IntuitionLogicHumans

Identifiers

PMID37462177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.