ArticleCancer medicine2023
A retrospective real-world experience of immunotherapy in patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Comparative Cohort Studies.Current oncology reports · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs and RWSs.Thoracic cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Extended Follow-Up Analysis of First-Line Atezolizumab in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.Thoracic cancer · 2025Observational
- Metabolic phenotype and gender may predict treatment outcomes of atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- The combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Real-World Insights into the Impact of Durvalumab on Stage III Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Comprehensive prognostic model for immunotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a multi-center study integrating clinical and blood biomarkers.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Real-world evidence for immunotherapy in the first-line or subsequent-line setting in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective real-world study.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Article
- Real-world impact of the introduction of chemo-immunotherapy in extended small cell lung cancer: a multicentric analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Article
- A retrospective real-world experience of immunotherapy in patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has only made modest progress in the past decade, with two immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), atezolizumab and durvalumab, approved for the treatment of SCLC by January 2022. However, currently, there is limited real-world data on ES-SCLC patients received immunotherapy.
methodsWe retrospectively collected and analyzed the demographic and treatment data of ES-SCLC patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2017 to January 2022. Survival and prognosis information was obtained through follow-up.
resultsA total of 353 ES-SCLC patients were included, of which 165 received immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as the first-line (FL) treatment (chemo-immune group), and 188 received chemotherapy (chemotherapy group). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of patients receiving immunotherapy as the FL treatment were better than the chemotherapy group (76.97% vs. 48.40%, p < 0.001, and 83.03% vs. 68.09%, p < 0.001). Moreover, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC patients receiving immunotherapy as the FL treatment were better than the chemotherapy group (6.7 months vs. 5.1 months, p < 0.001, and 12.5 months vs. 11.2 months, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the OS of ES-SCLC patients who received immunotherapy as second-line treatment was better than that in the chemotherapy group (15.9 months vs. 12.9 months, p = 0.036).
conclusionICIs combined with chemotherapy as the FL treatment could be beneficial to the ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS of ES-SCLC patients. Furthermore, ES-SCLC patients can benefit from ICIs in the second-line treatment, even if they had not received ICIs in the FL treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.