Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37461696›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Distinct brain morphometry patterns revealed by deep learning improve prediction of aphasia severity.

Alex Teghipco, Roger Newman-Norlund, Julius Fridriksson, Christopher Rorden, Leonardo Bonilha

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alex TeghipcoUniversity of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-7430-8695
Roger Newman-NorlundUniversity of South Carolina.
Julius FridrikssonUniversity of South Carolina.
Christopher RordenUniversity of South Carolina.
Leonardo BonilhaEmory University.
University of South Carolina · USEmory University · US

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BONILHA, LEONARDO F · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Neural Predictors of Anomia Recovery in AphasiaR01DC008355 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that post-stroke aphasia severity depends on the integrity of the brain beyond the stroke lesion. While measures of lesion anatomy and brain integrity combine synergistically to explain aphasic symptoms, significant interindividual variability remains unaccounted for. A possible explanatory factor may be the spatial distribution of brain atrophy beyond the lesion. This includes not just the specific brain areas showing atrophy, but also distinct three-dimensional patterns of atrophy. Here, we tested whether deep learning with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) on whole brain morphometry (i.e., segmented tissue volumes) and lesion anatomy can better predict which individuals with chronic stroke (N=231) have severe aphasia, and whether encoding spatial dependencies in the data might be capable of improving predictions by identifying unique individualized spatial patterns. We observed that CNN achieves significantly higher accuracy and F1 scores than Support Vector Machine (SVM), even when the SVM is nonlinear or integrates linear and nonlinear dimensionality reduction techniques. Performance parity was only achieved when the SVM was directly trained on the latent features learned by the CNN. Saliency maps demonstrated that the CNN leveraged widely distributed patterns of brain atrophy predictive of aphasia severity, whereas the SVM focused almost exclusively on the area around the lesion. Ensemble clustering of CNN saliency maps revealed distinct morphometry patterns that were unrelated to lesion size, highly consistent across individuals, and implicated unique brain networks associated with different cognitive processes as measured by the wider neuroimaging literature. Individualized predictions of severity depended on both ipsilateral and contralateral features outside of the location of stroke. Our findings illustrate that three-dimensional network distributions of atrophy in individuals with aphasia are directly associated with aphasia severity, underscoring the potential for deep learning to improve prognostication of behavioral outcomes from neuroimaging data, and highlighting the prospective benefits of interrogating spatial dependence at different scales in multivariate feature space.

Identifiers

PMID37461696
PMCPMC10350198
OpenAlexW4382895073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.