ArticleResearch square2023
Distinct brain morphometry patterns revealed by deep learning improve prediction of aphasia severity.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that post-stroke aphasia severity depends on the integrity of the brain beyond the stroke lesion. While measures of lesion anatomy and brain integrity combine synergistically to explain aphasic symptoms, significant interindividual variability remains unaccounted for. A possible explanatory factor may be the spatial distribution of brain atrophy beyond the lesion. This includes not just the specific brain areas showing atrophy, but also distinct three-dimensional patterns of atrophy. Here, we tested whether deep learning with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) on whole brain morphometry (i.e., segmented tissue volumes) and lesion anatomy can better predict which individuals with chronic stroke (N=231) have severe aphasia, and whether encoding spatial dependencies in the data might be capable of improving predictions by identifying unique individualized spatial patterns. We observed that CNN achieves significantly higher accuracy and F1 scores than Support Vector Machine (SVM), even when the SVM is nonlinear or integrates linear and nonlinear dimensionality reduction techniques. Performance parity was only achieved when the SVM was directly trained on the latent features learned by the CNN. Saliency maps demonstrated that the CNN leveraged widely distributed patterns of brain atrophy predictive of aphasia severity, whereas the SVM focused almost exclusively on the area around the lesion. Ensemble clustering of CNN saliency maps revealed distinct morphometry patterns that were unrelated to lesion size, highly consistent across individuals, and implicated unique brain networks associated with different cognitive processes as measured by the wider neuroimaging literature. Individualized predictions of severity depended on both ipsilateral and contralateral features outside of the location of stroke. Our findings illustrate that three-dimensional network distributions of atrophy in individuals with aphasia are directly associated with aphasia severity, underscoring the potential for deep learning to improve prognostication of behavioral outcomes from neuroimaging data, and highlighting the prospective benefits of interrogating spatial dependence at different scales in multivariate feature space.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.