ArticleResearch square2023
Characterizing the Use of Exercise Testing in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Patients: A Multi-Institutional Survey.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Long-term survival for repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) is excellent. We achieve this by close clinical monitoring to stratify prognosis and guide clinical decision-making. Cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPET) is used to help guide clinical decision making; however, there are no clear guidelines for its use in this population. We sought to describe practice variability with regards to exercise testing for rTOF patients and how exercise data is used to guide management. We distributed a survey to pediatric cardiologists via email. Analyses were performed using qualitative statistics, two-sample T-tests, and chi-squared analysis. One-hundred and three clinicians completed the survey with 83% reporting that they routinely send symptomatic rTOF patients for exercise testing and 59% for asymptomatic patients. Respondents who routinely test asymptomatic patients reported higher levels of perceived helpfulness of exercise testing (p = 0.04) and comfort with CPET interpretation (p = 0.03). Nearly all respondents (92%) reported changing management primarily based on exercise testing results, with 62% reporting "occasionally changing management" and 10% reporting "frequently changing management". Results indicated that exercise test results influenced clinical decisions, such as the timing of interventions, need for additional imaging, or the initiation of exercise interventions. There was a statistically significant relationship between the perceived helpfulness of exercise testing and the likelihood of management changes (p < 0.01). The variability in attitudes and practices highlights the need for evidence-based guidelines addressing exercise testing in rTOF, particularly for asymptomatic patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.