ArticleResearch square2023
Accounting for sex differences as a continuous variable in cancer treatments.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The significant sex differences that exist in cancer mechanisms, incidence, and survival, have yet to impact clinical practice. We propose that one barrier to translation is that sex differences in cancer phenotypes resemble sex differences in height: highly overlapping, but distinct, male and female population distributions that vary continuously between female- and male- skewed extremes. A consequence of this variance is that sex-specific treatments are rendered unrealistic, and our translational goal should be adaptation of treatment to the variable sex-effect on targetable pathways. To develop a tool that could advance this goal, we applied a Bayesian Nearest Neighbor (BNN) analysis to 8370 cancer transcriptomes from 26 different adult and 4 different pediatric cancer types to establish patient-specific Transcriptomic Indices (TI). TI precisely positions a patient's whole transcriptome on axes of mechanistic phenotypes like cell cycle signaling and immunity that exhibit skewing in the cancer population relative to sex-identified extremes (poles). Importantly, the TI approach reveals that even when TI values are identical, underlying mechanisms in male and female individuals can differ in identifiable ways. Thus, cancer type, patient sex, and TI value provides a novel and patient- specific mechanistic identifier that can be used for precision cancer treatment planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.