Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37461025›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Undergraduate ultrasound training: prospective comparison of two different peer assisted course models on national standards.

Johannes Weimer, Anna Dionysopoulou, Kai-Uwe Strelow, Holger Buggenhagen, Julia Weinmann-Menke, Klaus Dirks, Andreas Weimer, Julian Künzel, Norbert Börner, Michael Ludwig and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Innovations in ultrasound training in obstetrics.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Johannes WeimerRudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. weimer@uni-mainz.de.
Anna DionysopoulouDepartment of obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Kai-Uwe StrelowRudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Holger BuggenhagenRudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Julia Weinmann-MenkeDepartment of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Klaus DirksDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Rems-Murr-Klinikum, Winnenden, Germany.
Andreas WeimerCenter of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julian KünzelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Norbert BörnerGastroenterological Medical Group Offices, MED Specialist Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Michael LudwigDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Hospital of the German Armed Forces Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Yang YangDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Liv LorenzDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Carlotta Ille *Rudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Lukas Müller *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA thorough knowledge of sonography is essential in clinical practice. Therefore, sonography training is increasingly incorporated into the medical school curriculum, entailing different course models. The question arises which model is most effective to convey sustained sonographic skills.

methodsTwo different peer-assisted learning (PAL) sonography course models were developed as part of a clinical prospective study. The course content was based on the national resident curriculum of the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM). Model A consists of a 10-week course and model B of a two-day compact course. Each model entailed 20 teaching units (TU). A script was used to prepare for each unit. Two modified OSCE exams of the ultrasound skills (max = 50 points per exam) were performed during the last teaching unit to assess the competence level. For subjective self-assessment and model evaluation, a questionnaire with a 7-point Likert scale was employed.

resultsA total of 888 students of the 3rd year participated as part of a voluntary elective in the study (744 in model A and 144 in model B). In the exams, participants in model A (median 43 points) scored significantly higher than those in model B (median 39; p < 0.01). Participants in model A (mean 1.71 points) obtained significantly higher mean competency gain scores in subject knowledge than model B (mean 1.43 points; p < 0.01) participants. All participants were satisfied with the course concept (A: mean 1.68 vs. B: mean 1.78 points; p = 0.05), the teaching materials (A: mean 1.81 vs. B: mean 1.69 points; p = 0.52), and the tutor's didactic skills (A: mean 1.24 vs. B: mean 1.15 points; p < 0.05).

conclusionThese results suggest that sonography-specific competency may be obtained through different course models, with a model stretching over several weeks leading to a higher competence level. Further research should assess the long-term retention of the skills obtained in different models.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducational MeasurementHumansProspective StudiesTeachingCourse modelsCurriculum developementEducationPeer assisted learningUltrasound curriculumUndergraduate training

Identifiers

PMID37461025
PMCPMC10353150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.