Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460943›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2023

All professions can benefit - a mixed-methods study on simulation-based teamwork training for operating room teams.

Cecilia Escher, Hans Rystedt, Johan Creutzfeldt, Lisbet Meurling, Leif Hedman, Li Felländer-Tsai, Ann Kjellin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cecilia EscherCenter for Advanced Medical Simulation and Training (CAMST), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. cecilia.escher@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7086-7409
Hans RystedtSimulator Centre West, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan CreutzfeldtCenter for Advanced Medical Simulation and Training (CAMST), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lisbet MeurlingCenter for Advanced Medical Simulation and Training (CAMST), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Leif HedmanDepartment of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Li Felländer-TsaiCenter for Advanced Medical Simulation and Training (CAMST), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ann KjellinCenter for Advanced Medical Simulation and Training (CAMST), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 721-2012-5450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperating rooms have become more technically complex due to new advanced procedures, which has increased demands on teamwork in the operating room. In response, team training has been proposed to improve team performance, workplace culture, and patient safety. We developed and delivered a simulation-based team training course for entire professional surgical teams. This type of intervention has been proposed by researchers but has not been widely published. The aims of this intervention study were to examine participants' reactions to the course in terms of their motivation for the training and their self-efficacy in relation to their performance, as well as their views on transferring the lessons learned in the course to their workplace.

methodsIn a prospective mixed-methods intervention study, operating room professionals participated in a full-day simulation-based teamwork training course. Learning objectives were nontechnical skills, specifically communication and collaboration across the team. Seventy-one staff members representing 5 operating room professions were included, and the average work experience of participants was 6 years. Quantitative data on self-efficacy and situational motivation were collected by questionnaires before and after training. Qualitative data were collected through 5 focus group interviews that took place in direct relation to the courses and included a total of 31 participants. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsAll occupations showed a similar pattern in terms of increases in self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation after the training. Analysis of the qualitative data showed that training in one's profession and in authentic multiprofessional teams was important factors for motivation. Participating staff described an awareness of undesirable communication barriers in surgical teams that can lead to risks for patients. Systematic training was definitely perceived as a means to reduce barriers and improve communication and collaboration.

conclusionSimulation-based training was equally well received by all professional groups. Our results confirm the feasibility of this type of training for professional teams and promising opportunities for improving teamwork skills. The qualitative data reveal both opportunities and limitations for transferring the learning experiences to the workplace.

Identifiers

PMID37460943
PMCPMC10351117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.