Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460868›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Wireless patient monitoring and Efficacy Safety Score in postoperative treatment at the ward: evaluation of time consumption and usability.

Erlend Johan Skraastad, Petter Christian Borchgrevink, Lillian Asbøll Opøyen, Johan Ræder

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erlend Johan SkraastadClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 3250 Torgarden, 7006, Trondheim, Norway. Erlend.Johan.Skraastad@stolav.no.ORCID 0000-0002-5652-9435
Petter Christian BorchgrevinkDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Lillian Asbøll OpøyenDepartment of Thoracic and Occupational Medicine and Orkdal Dept. of Internal Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5142-0337
Johan RæderDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2487-0839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate objective time consumption and how nurses perceived introducing wireless patient monitoring (WPM) and a validated score on patient quality and safety, the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), at a mixed surgery ward. After fulfilling a randomised controlled trial combining the ESS and WPM, we addressed time consumption and conducted a questionnaire survey among nurses who participated in the study. The questionnaire appraised the nurses' evaluation of introducing these tools for postoperative management. Of 28 invited nurses, 24 responded to the questionnaire, and 92% reported the ESS and WPM-systems to increase patient safety and quality of care. 67% felt the intervention took extra time, but objective workload measurements revealed reduced time to 1/3 using ESS and WPM compared to standard manual assessment. Improved confidence when using the systems was reported by 83% and improved working situation by 75%. In a test situation to measure time consumption, the ESS and pre-attached WPM-systems require less time than the conventional standard of care, and may allow for more frequent clinical monitoring at the post-surgical ward. The combination of the ESS and the WPM systems was perceived as positive by participating nurses and further clinical development and research is warranted.

Indexed as

HospitalsPatient SafetyHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicDecision makingNursingPatient safetyPoint-of-care systemsPostoperative care

Identifiers

PMID37460868
PMCPMC10879331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.