Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460830›Full record

ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2023

Efficacy of different surgical treatments for management of anal fistula: a network meta-analysis.

S Bhat, W Xu, C Varghese, N Dubey, C I Wells, C Harmston, G O'Grady, I P Bissett, A Y Lin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Enhanced surgical management of complex anal fistulasWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Efficacy of anal duct ligation and muscle closure: A novel sphincter-preserving surgical technique for fistula-in-ano.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S BhatSurgical and Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-8996
W XuSurgical and Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
C VargheseSurgical and Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
N DubeyDepartment of General Medicine, Tauranga Hospital, Te Whatu Ora, Tauranga, New Zealand.
C I WellsSurgical and Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
C HarmstonSurgical and Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
G O'GradySurgical and Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
I P BissettSurgical and Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
A Y LinDepartment of Surgery and Anaesthesia, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. tony.lin@otago.ac.nz.
University of Auckland · NZTauranga Hospital · NZWellington Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrently, the anal fistula treatment which optimises healing and preserves bowel continence remains unclear. The aim of our study was to compare the relative efficacy of different surgical treatments for AF through a network meta-analysis.

methodsSystematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases up to October 2022 identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical treatments for anal fistulae. Fistulae were classified as simple (inter-sphincteric or low trans-sphincteric fistulae crossing less than 30% of the external anal sphincter (EAS)) and complex (high trans-sphincteric fistulae involving more than 30% of the EAS). Treatments evaluated in only one trial were excluded from the primary analyses to minimise bias. The primary outcomes were rates of success in achieving AF healing and bowel incontinence.

resultsFifty-two RCTs were included. Of the 14 treatments considered, there were no significant differences regarding short-term (6 months or less postoperatively) and long-term (more than 6 months postoperatively) success rates between any of the treatments in patients with both simple and complex anal fistula. Ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) ranked best for minimising bowel incontinence in simple (99.1% of comparisons; 3 trials, n = 70 patients) and complex anal fistula (86.2% of comparisons; 3 trials, n = 102 patients).

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence in existing RCTs to recommend one treatment over another regarding their short and long-term efficacy in successfully facilitating healing of both simple and complex anal fistulae. However, LIFT appears to be associated with the least impairment of bowel continence, irrespective of AF classification.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceRectal FistulaAnal CanalHumansLigationTreatment OutcomeWound HealingComplexFistula-in-anoHealingIncontinenceSphincter preserving

Identifiers

PMID37460830
PMCPMC10485107
OpenAlexW4384499646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.