ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Rescue technique for self-expandable metallic stent placement using ultrathin endoscope after failure of the conventional method in patients with malignant colon obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsSelf-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) can be used to treat malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO). Guidewire insertion to the proximal site of MCO is the most important step for SEMS placement. However, some patients cannot undergo guidewire insertion because of total obstruction or location at anatomically challenging areas. We report a guidewire insertion technique using an ultrathin endoscope (UTE) in patients with MCO in whom conventional SEMS insertion failed.
methodsThis study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at three academic centers in Korea. The medical records of 956 consecutive patients who underwent SEMS placement during 2012-2021 were analyzed. After failing guidewire insertion using a colonoscope, a UTE was inserted. Guidewire insertion was done through the working channel of the UTE. Following guidewire insertion, the endoscope was removed from the patient. While removing the endoscope, the guidewire was advanced to be located at the originally inserted site. Then, the colonoscope was inserted over the guidewire, and SEMS was replaced.
resultsConventional SEMS insertion failed in 75 patients. Of these, guidewire insertion using a UTE was tried in 59 patients. The rate of technical success was 91.5% (54/59). Considering all patients, the overall technical success rate of SEMS placement was 97.8% (935/956). This technique increased the technical success rate by 5.6% among the total cohort.
conclusionsThe UTE facilitated guidewire insertion and enhanced the overall success rate for SEMS placement. In addition, this technique can be used as a rescue method when guidewire insertion fails using a colonoscope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.