ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Predicting coronary plaque progression with conventional plaque parameters and radiomics features derived from coronary CT angiography.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explainable ML for ACS culprit plaques: a multidimensional CCTA model highlighting hemodynamic increment.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- AI-driven radiomics in vascular disease: a narrative review of image analysis and clinical translation.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Pericoronary fat attenuation index on coronary CT angiography and cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Predicting chronic stenosis progression of stable coronary artery disease using peri-coronary fat attenuation index derived from coronary computed tomography angiography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Prediction of plaque progression using different machine learning models of pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics based on coronary computed tomography angiography.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Overlooked and underpowered: a meta-research addressing sample size in radiomics prediction models for binary outcomes.European radiology · 2025Article
- Robustness of radiomics among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems: a texture phantom study.European radiology · 2025Article
- A Scoping Review of Machine-Learning Derived Radiomic Analysis of CT and PET Imaging to Investigate Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Coronary CTA-based radiomic signature of pericoronary adipose tissue predict rapid plaque progression.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- A diagnostic model for non-invasive localization of culprit lesions in NSTE-ACS by integrating CCTA geometric and plaque parameters.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the value of combining conventional plaque parameters and radiomics features derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for predicting coronary plaque progression. MATERIALS AND
methodsClinical data and CCTA images of 400 patients who underwent at least two CCTA examinations between January 2009 and August 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Diameter stenosis, total plaque volume and burden, calcified plaque volume and burden, noncalcified plaque volume and burden (NCPB), pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI), and other conventional plaque parameters were recorded. The patients were assigned to a training cohort (n = 280) and a validation cohort (n = 120) in a 7:3 ratio using a stratified random splitting method. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive abilities of conventional parameters (model 1), radiomics features (model 2), and their combination (model 3).
resultsFAI and NCPB were identified as independent risk factors for coronary plaque progression in the training cohort. Both model 2 (training cohort AUC: 0.814, p < 0.001; validation cohort AUC: 0.729, p = 0.288) and model 3 (training cohort AUC: 0.824, p < 0.001; validation cohort AUC: 0.758, p = 0.042) had better diagnostic performances in predicting plaque progression than model 1 (training cohort AUC: 0.646; validation cohort AUC: 0.654). Moreover, model 3 was slightly higher than model 2, although not statistically significant.
conclusionsThe combination of conventional coronary plaque parameters and CCTA-derived radiomics features had a better ability to predict plaque progression than conventional parameters alone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The conventional coronary plaque characteristics such as noncalcified plaque burden, pericoronary fat attenuation index, and radiomics features derived from CCTA can identify plaques prone to progression, which is helpful for further clinical decision-making of coronary artery disease. KEY POINTS: • FAI and NCPB were identified as independent risk factors for predicting plaque progression. • Coronary plaque radiomics features were more advantageous than conventional parameters in predicting plaque progression. • The combination of conventional coronary plaque parameters and radiomics features could significantly improve the predictive ability of plaque progression over conventional parameters alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.