Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460773›Full record

ArticleCarbon balance and management2023

Wildfire national carbon accounting: how natural and anthropogenic landscape fires emissions are treated in the 2020 Australian government greenhouse gas accounts report to the UNFCCC.

David Mjs Bowman, Grant J Williamson, Mercy Ndalila, Stephen H Roxburgh, Shaun Suitor, Rodney J Keenan

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Carbon balance and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David Mjs BowmanFire Centre, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. david.bowman@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8075-124X
Grant J WilliamsonFire Centre, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Mercy NdalilaSchool of Agriculture, Environment and Health Sciences, Machakos University, P.O. BOX 136, Machakos, 90100, Kenya.
Stephen H RoxburghCSIRO Environment, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT r2601, Australia.
Shaun SuitorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Rodney J KeenanSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUMachakos University · KEThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council FL220100099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting of emissions from land use, land-use change, and forestry necessarily involves consideration of landscape fire. This is of particular importance for Australia given that natural and human fire is a common occurrence, and many ecosystems are adapted to fire, and require periodic burning for plant regeneration and ecological health. Landscape fire takes many forms, can be started by humans or by lightning, and can be managed or uncontrolled. We briefly review the underlying logic of greenhouse gas accounting involving landscape fire in the 2020 Australian Government GHG inventory report. The treatment of wildfire that Australia chooses to enact under the internationally agreed guidelines is based on two core assumptions (a) that effects of natural and anthropogenic fire in Australian vegetation carbon stocks are transient and they return to the pre-fire level relatively quickly, and (b) that historically and geographically anomalous wildfires in forests should be excluded from national anthropogenic emission estimates because they are beyond human control. It is now widely accepted that anthropogenic climate change is contributing to increased frequency and severity of forest fires in Australia, therefore challenging assumptions about the human agency in fire-related GHG emissions and carbon balance. Currently, the national inventory focuses on forest fires; we suggest national greenhouse gas accounting needs to provide a more detailed reporting of vegetation fires including: (a) more detailed mapping of fire severity patterns; (b) more comprehensive emission factors; (c) better growth and recovery models from different vegetation types; (d) improved understanding how fires of different severities affect carbon stocks; and (e) improved analysis of the human agency behind the causes of emissions, including ignition types and fire-weather conditions. This more comprehensive accounting of carbon emissions would provide greater incentives to improve fire management practices that reduce the frequency, severity, and extent of uncontrolled landscape fires.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic firesGreenhouse gas emissionsIPCCLULUCFUNFCCCWildfire

Identifiers

PMID37460773
PMCPMC10353246
OpenAlexW4384522116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.