Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460734›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024

Defining Standard Values for FaceReader Facial Expression Software Output.

Agnes Zhu, Thanapoom Boonipat, Sai Cherukuri, Uldis Bite

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Application of Artificial Intelligence Software to Identify Emotions of Lung Cancer Patients in Preoperative Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agnes ZhuMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, 200 1st ST. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Zhu.Agnes@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8130-9370
Thanapoom BoonipatDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sai CherukuriDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Uldis BiteDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFaceReader is a validated software package that uses computer vision technology for facial expression recognition which has become increasingly popular in academic research to expedite, scale, and decrease the cost of facial emotion analysis. In this study, we compare FaceReader analysis to human evaluator interpretation in order to define standard values for the software output.

methodsRandomly generated facial images produced by generative adversarial networks were analyzed using FaceReader and by survey participants (n=496). The age, facial emotion, and intensity of emotion as determined by the software and survey participants were recorded. Results were analyzed and compared.

results80 randomly generated images (20 children, 20 young adult, 20 middle aged, and 20 elderly; 38 male and 42 female) were included. Analysis of correlation between most common expression identified by FaceReader and the primary emotion detected by surveyors showed strong correlation (κ = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.91). On analyzing this correlation by age group, there was fair correlation in children (κ = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.078-0.72), perfect correlation in young adults (κ = 1.0, 95% CI = 1.0-1.0), strong correlation in middle aged adults (κ = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.53-1) and near perfect in elderly adults(κ = 0.9 , 95% CI = 0.7-1.0).

conclusionsWe provided the first study defining the expected average values generated by FaceReader in generally smiling images. This can be used as a standard in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

FaceFacial ExpressionAgedChildEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmilingSoftwareSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAesthetic surgeryArtificial intelligenceSurgical outcomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.