Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460676›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2024

Young glial progenitor cells competitively replace aged and diseased human glia in the adult chimeric mouse brain.

Ricardo Vieira, John N Mariani, Nguyen P T Huynh, Hans J T Stephensen, Renee Solly, Ashley Tate, Steven Schanz, Natasha Cotrupi, Marzieh Mousaei, Jon Sporring and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Critical role of cell competition in gliomagenesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo VieiraCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John N MarianiCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Nguyen P T HuynhCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans J T StephensenCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-0571
Renee SollyCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Ashley TateCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Steven SchanzCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Natasha CotrupiCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Marzieh MousaeiCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-2609
Jon SporringDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1261-6702
Abdellatif BenraissCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Steven A GoldmanCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark. steven_goldman@urmc.rochester.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5498-4303
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Cell-intrinsic and contextual determinants of aging by human glial progenitor cellsR01AG072298 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GOLDMAN, STEVEN ALAN · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competition among adult brain cells has not been extensively researched. To investigate whether healthy glia can outcompete diseased human glia in the adult forebrain, we engrafted wild-type (WT) human glial progenitor cells (hGPCs) produced from human embryonic stem cells into the striata of adult mice that had been neonatally chimerized with mutant Huntingtin (mHTT)-expressing hGPCs. The WT hGPCs outcompeted and ultimately eliminated their human Huntington's disease (HD) counterparts, repopulating the host striata with healthy glia. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that WT hGPCs acquired a YAP1/MYC/E2F-defined dominant competitor phenotype upon interaction with the host HD glia. WT hGPCs also outcompeted older resident isogenic WT cells that had been transplanted neonatally, suggesting that competitive success depended primarily on the relative ages of competing populations, rather than on the presence of mHTT. These data indicate that aged and diseased human glia may be broadly replaced in adult brain by younger healthy hGPCs, suggesting a therapeutic strategy for the replacement of aged and diseased human glia.

Indexed as

BrainHuntington DiseaseNeurogliaAnimalsHumansMiceStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID37460676
PMCPMC11098747
OpenAlexW4384522233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.