Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460668›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2023

Influential Factors in the Efficacy of Hemoporfin-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy for Port-wine Stains.

Zhu Min, Liu Jing, Zhou Jun, Qiao Simeng, Wang Zhaoyang, Wang Zhao, Zeng Weihui

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Rapamycin and HPPH Co-Loaded Nanodrug Delivered via Dissolvable Microneedles to Treat Port-Wine Stains].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhu MinDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Liu JingDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Zhou JunDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Qiao SimengDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Wang ZhaoyangDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Wang ZhaoDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Zeng WeihuiDepartment of Dermatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China. zengwh88@126.com.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy (HMME-PDT) is commonly used in the treatment of port-wine stains (PWS). However, the influential factors for the efficacy of the treatment are not well defined. This study intends to observe the influential factors for the efficacy of HMME-PDT in the treatment of port-wine stains (PWS). A total of 551 patients with PWS of head and neck was enrolled in this retrospective study. Further screening the patients of facial PWS, 484 patients were chosen. Patients were treated with HMME-PDT. All patients received 1~3 sessions of treatment with 2~3-month intervals. We photographed the lesions before each session and 2~3 months after the last session. Ages, sessions, lesion subtypes, and previous treatment history were related to the response of HMME-PDT (P =0.032, P<0.001, P=0.012, P=0.003 respectively). Treatment sessions were the independent factor correlated with efficacy after 3 sessions of treatment. Patients with no treatment history targeting PWS showed higher efficacy than those were treated with laser or other photodynamic treatment (P<0.05). The efficacy was higher by increasing the sessions of treatment. The efficacy was higher for lesion on maxillary prominence area and mandibular prominence area that on frontonasal prominence area and optic vesicle area (P<0.05). HMME-PDT is an effective in the treatment of PWS. Patients received no previous treatment for PWS, total treatment sessions and lesion on maxillary prominence area and mandibular prominence area are positive factors.

Indexed as

MalocclusionPhotochemotherapyPort-Wine StainHematoporphyrinsHumansPhotosensitizing AgentsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomehematoporphyrin monomethyl etherHematoporphyrinsPhotosensitizing AgentsHemoporfinPhotodynamic therapyPort-wine stains

Identifiers

PMID37460668
OpenAlexW4384500304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.