Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460644›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023

Management of Central Venous Stenoses and Occlusions.

Panagiotis Kitrou, Konstantinos Katsanos, Dimitrios Karnabatidis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Inferior and Superior Vena Cava Reconstruction.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Regarding "Management of Central Venous Stenoses and Occlusions".Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Panagiotis KitrouInterventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece. panoskitrou@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7631-2068
Konstantinos KatsanosInterventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece.
Dimitrios KarnabatidisInterventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece.
University of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symptomatic central venous stenosis and occlusion remains the gordian knot of vascular access. Advances in techniques, like sharp recanalization, allowed for improved success rates in crossing these difficult lesions. There is also increasing evidence of new devices in treating central venous stenosis and, at the same time, improving the time needed between interventions. High-pressure balloons, paclitaxel-coated balloons, bare metal stents and covered stents have been tested with an aim to offer additional treatment options, although obstacles still exist. In the current review, authors describe relevant techniques and options, provide the evidence and evaluate the actual implementation of these devices in this demanding field.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonArteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalVascular DiseasesConstriction, PathologicHumansRenal DialysisStentsTreatment OutcomeVascular PatencyVeinsCentral venous stenosisCovered stentsDialysisPaclitaxel-coated balloonsSharp recanalizationVascular access

Identifiers

PMID37460644
PMCPMC10471665
OpenAlexW4384500122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.