ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2023
Quantitative PET-based biomarkers in lymphoma: getting ready for primetime.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidic Light-Scattering Imaging Coupled with Deep Learning for Label-Free Single-Cell Classification of Lymphoma Cells.Biosensors · 2026Article
- The predictive and prognostic role of baseline 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT volumetric and dissemination features in classical Hodgkin lymphoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- SALT: Introducing a framework for hierarchical segmentations in medical imaging using label trees.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A prognostic index integrating deep learning baseline PET/CT biomarkers and multi-omics profiling in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of baseline body composition parameters fromAnnals of hematology · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of interim [European radiology · 2025Article
- Baseline total lesion glycolysis identifies high-risk patients with immunosuppressive signatures in early-stage natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Association of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Baseline [BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Feasibility of UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Recent Updates of PET in Lymphoma: FDG and Beyond.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Dual-Layer Spectral Detector Computed Tomography Quantitative Parameters: A Potential Tool for Lymph Node Activity Determination in Lymphoma Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- PET/CT Biomarkers Enable Risk Stratification of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Enrolled in the LOTIS-2 Clinical Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- Semiquantitative 2-[Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The use of functional quantitative biomarkers extracted from routine PET-CT scans to characterize clinical responses in patients with lymphoma is gaining increased attention, and these biomarkers can outperform established clinical risk factors. Total metabolic tumour volume enables individualized estimation of survival outcomes in patients with lymphoma and has shown the potential to predict response to therapy suitable for risk-adapted treatment approaches in clinical trials. The deployment of machine learning tools in molecular imaging research can assist in recognizing complex patterns and, with image classification, in tumour identification and segmentation of data from PET-CT scans. Initial studies using fully automated approaches to calculate metabolic tumour volume and other PET-based biomarkers have demonstrated appropriate correlation with calculations from experts, warranting further testing in large-scale studies. The extraction of computer-based quantitative tumour characterization through radiomics can provide a comprehensive view of phenotypic heterogeneity that better captures the molecular and functional features of the disease. Additionally, radiomics can be integrated with genomic data to provide more accurate prognostic information. Further improvements in PET-based biomarkers are imminent, although their incorporation into clinical decision-making currently has methodological shortcomings that need to be addressed with confirmatory prospective validation in selected patient populations. In this Review, we discuss the current knowledge, challenges and opportunities in the integration of quantitative PET-based biomarkers in clinical trials and the routine management of patients with lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.