ReviewNature protocols2023
Structural characterization of protein-material interfacial interactions using lysine reactivity profiling-mass spectrometry.
Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in proteomic strategies for target identification of traditional Chinese medicine.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how proteins and materials interact is useful for evaluating the safety of biomedical micro/nanomaterials, toxicity estimation and design of nano-drugs and catalytic activity improvement of bio-inorganic functional hybrids. However, characterizing the interfacial molecular details of protein-micro/nanomaterial hybrids remains a great challenge. This protocol describes the lysine reactivity profiling-mass spectrometry strategy for determining which parts of a protein are interacting with the micro/nanomaterials. Lysine residues occur frequently on hydrophilic protein surfaces, and their reactivity is dependent on the accessibility of their amine groups. The accessibility of a lysine residue is lower when it is in contact with another object; allosteric effects resulting from this interaction might reduce or increase the reactivity of remote lysine residues. Lysine reactivity is therefore a useful indicator of protein localization orientation, interaction sequence regions, binding sites and modulated protein structures in the protein-material hybrids. We describe the optimized two-step isotope dimethyl labeling strategy for protein-material hybrids under their native and denaturing conditions in sequence. The comparative quantification results of lysine reactivity are only dependent on the native microenvironments of lysine local structures. We also highlight other critical steps including protein digestion, elution from materials, data processing and interfacial structure analysis. The two-step isotope labeling steps need ~5 h, and the whole protocol including digestion, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, data processing and structure analysis needs ~3-5 d.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.