ArticleScientific reports2023
Unsupervised abnormality detection in neonatal MRI brain scans using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Neonatal Brain: Modalities, Scoring Systems, and Clinical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Static Diagnosis to Dynamic Guidance : Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroimaging.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Temporal analysis of prevalence and antibiotic-resistance patterns in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates in a 19-year retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of 3D medical imaging data has been a large topic of focus in the area of Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence, though little work has been done in algorithmic (particularly unsupervised) analysis of neonatal brain MRI's. A myriad of conditions can manifest at an early age, including neonatal encephalopathy (NE), which can result in lifelong physical consequences. As such, there is a dire need for better biomarkers of NE and other conditions. The objective of the study is to improve identification of anomalies and prognostication of neonatal MRI brain scans. We introduce a framework designed to support the analysis and assessment of neonatal MRI brain scans, the results of which can be used as an aid to neuroradiologists. We explored the efficacy of the framework through iterations of several deep convolutional Autoencoder (AE) unsupervised modeling architectures designed to learn normalcy of the neonatal brain structure. We tested this framework on the developing human connectome project (dHCP) dataset with 97 patients that were previously categorized by severity. Our framework demonstrated the model's ability to identify and distinguish subtle morphological signatures present in brain structures. Normal and abnormal neonatal brain scans can be distinguished with reasonable accuracy, correctly categorizing them in up to 83% of cases. Most critically, new brain anomalies originally missed during the radiological reading were identified and corroborated by a neuroradiologist. This framework and our modeling approach demonstrate an ability to improve prognostication of neonatal brain conditions and are able to localize new anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.