ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2024
Testosterone replacement therapy is associated with high satisfaction rates: results of a survey study.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite a well-documented increase in both the prevalence of Testosterone Deficiency (TD) and prescription of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), few studies have investigated the preferences of patients receiving TRT and factors associated with increased treatment satisfaction. To investigate the preferences of patients receiving TRT and factors associated with improved treatment satisfaction, an open survey was completed by 140 men receiving TRT at a single institution. Survey questions investigated demographics, symptom burden of TD, TRT regimen, treatment preferences, and treatment satisfaction. 62.7% of patients were satisfied with their current TRT regimen. Those using auto-injectors (91.7%, odds ration [OR] = 9.3), subcutaneous pellets (90.0%, OR = 15.2), and intramuscular injections (67.5%, OR = 5.7), were with significantly increased satisfaction rates (p < 0.05). The majority of patients indicated that they would prefer to receive TRT injections when self-administered or administered at home. While patients noted that treatment efficacy was a significant driving factor when evaluating a TRT regimen, few patients felt that cost was the most significant factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37460597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.