ArticleScientific reports2023
Evaluation of stresses on mandible bone and prosthetic parts in fixed prosthesis by utilizing CFR-PEEK, PEKK and PEEK frameworks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rehabilitation of the Severely Atrophic Maxilla with Subperiosteal Implants: A Biomechanical and Decision Analysis of Material and Configuration Choices.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Prosthetic Material Properties and Implant Number on Stress Distribution in Implant-Bone Systems Under Bruxism Loading: A Finite Element Study.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Computational analysis of L4-L5 interspinous process devices and interbody fusion spacers using ceramic and polymeric materials via finite element modeling and artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of Stress Distribution Around Traditional and Sleeve Fixed Partial Denture Designs: Finite Element Analysis.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Cantilevered 2-Unit Implant-Supported Prostheses: A 3D Finite Element Study.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Finite element investigation for improving chest wall reconstruction process using ceramic and polymeric implants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Biocompatibility and the Effect of Titanium and PEKK on the Osseointegration of Customized Facial Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- DFT-based investigation of polyetherketoneketone materials for surface modification for dental implants.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Complications Associated with Fixed Partial Denture: A Prospective Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Effect of different constraining boundary conditions on simulated femoral stresses and strains during gait.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Shock Absorption Capacity of High-Performance Polymers for Dental Implant-Supported Restorations: In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fixed prostheses are appropriate treatment solutions for edentulous patients. In fixed prostheses, following "All on four", titanium frameworks are commonly used to support the implants. However, the limitations of titanium have prompted researchers to search for alternative materials (e.g. polymers). This study applied finite element investigation to evaluate the stress distribution in the parts of fixed prosthesis and the surrounding bone tissue, using polymeric frameworks in place of titanium, and different densities of spongy bone. As, the success of fixed prosthesis was predicted to be influenced also by bone quality, particularly spongy bone density. Fixed prosthesis was constructed on edentulous mandible, then different frameworks (CFR-PEEK 60%, CFR-PEEK 30%, PEKK, and PEEK) were stimulated instead of titanium, under 300N unilateral and bilateral forces. Three densities of spongy bone were stimulated which are normal, low and high. The choice of framework material depended on the density of spongy bone. Moreover, PEEK framework showed the lowest stress values on bone tissues and the highest stress values on mucosa. All frameworks could be used in the fixed prosthesis, in the cases of normal and high densities of spongy bone. In low-density case, soft frameworks (PEKK and PEEK) were recommended to reduce the stresses generated on bone tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.