Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460584›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Clinical relevance of deep learning models in predicting the onset timing of cancer pain exacerbation.

Yeong Hak Bang, Yoon Ho Choi, Mincheol Park, Soo-Yong Shin, Seok Jin Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Autologous platelet-rich fibrin as an alternative epidural patch for persistent post-dural puncture headache: A single-center observational study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yeong Hak Bang *Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon Ho Choi *Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, Korea.
Mincheol ParkCenter for Artificial Intelligence, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.
Soo-Yong ShinDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, Korea. sooyong.shin@gmail.com.
Seok Jin KimDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, Korea. kstwoh@skku.edu.
Sungkyunkwan University · KRKorean Association Of Science and Technology Studies · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer pain is a challenging clinical problem that is encountered in the management of cancer pain. We aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of deep learning models that predict the onset of cancer pain exacerbation in hospitalized patients. We defined cancer pain exacerbation (CPE) as the pain with a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of ≥ 4. We investigated the performance of the deep learning models using the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) with different input lengths and time binning. All the pain records were obtained from the electronic medical records of the hematology-oncology wards in a Samsung Medical Center between July 2016 and February 2020. The model was externally validated using the holdout method with 20% of the datasets. The most common type of cancer was lung cancer (n = 745, 21.7%), and the median CPE per day was 1.01. The NRS pain records showed circadian patterns that correlated with NRS pain patterns of the previous days. The correlation of the NRS scores showed a positive association with the closeness of the NRS pattern of the day with forecast date and size of time binning. The long short-term memory-based model exhibited a good performance by demonstrating 9 times the best performance and 8 times the second-best performance among 21 different settings. The best performance was achieved with 120 h input and 12 h bin lengths (MCC: 0.4927). Our study demonstrated the possibility of predicting CPE using deep learning models, thereby suggesting that preemptive cancer pain management using deep learning could potentially improve patients' daily life.

Indexed as

Cancer PainDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsClinical RelevanceHumansPain

Identifiers

PMID37460584
PMCPMC10352236
OpenAlexW4384524031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.