Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460392›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2023

Exact and Computationally Robust Solutions for Cylindrical Magnets Systems with Programmable Magnetization.

Federico Masiero, Edoardo Sinibaldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Federico MasieroBiorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, Pontedera, 56025, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4271-109X
Edoardo SinibaldiIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego 30, Genoa, 16163, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9755-3431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic systems based on permanent magnets are receiving growing attention, in particular for micro/millirobotics and biomedical applications. Their design landscape is expanded by the possibility to program magnetization, yet enabling analytical results, crucial for containing computational costs, are lacking. The dipole approximation is systematically used (and often strained), because exact and computationally robust solutions are to be unveiled even for common geometries such as cylindrical magnets, which are ubiquitously used in fundamental research and applications. In this study, exact solutions are disclosed for magnetic field and gradient of a cylindrical magnet with generic uniform magnetization, which can be robustly computed everywhere within and outside the magnet, and directly extend to magnets systems of arbitrary complexity. Based on them, exact and computationally robust solutions are unveiled for force and torque between coaxial magnets. The obtained analytical solutions overstep the dipole approximation, thus filling a long-standing gap, and offer strong computational gains versus numerical simulations (up to 10

Indexed as

cylindrical magnets systemsexact analytical solutionmagnetic actuationmagnetic field and gradientmagnetic force and torqueprogrammable magnetization

Identifiers

PMID37460392
PMCPMC10477869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.