Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460272›Full record

Observational studyOpen heart2023

Predictors of worse outcome after postponing non-emergency cardiac interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Stefanie Andreß, Dominik Felbel, Alex Mack, Manuel Rattka, Sascha d'Almeida, Dominik Buckert, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Armin Imhof, Tilman Stephan

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefanie Andreß *Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany.
Dominik Felbel *Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0649-7364
Alex MackDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany.
Manuel RattkaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany.
Sascha d'AlmeidaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany.
Dominik BuckertDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany.
Wolfgang RottbauerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany.
Armin ImhofDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany.
Tilman StephanDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany tilman.stephan@uniklinik-ulm.de.
University Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDeferral of non-emergency cardiac procedures is associated with increased early emergency cardiovascular hospitalisation. This study aimed to identify predictors of worse clinical outcome after deferral of non-emergency cardiovascular interventions.

methodsThis observational case-control study included consecutive patients whose non-emergency cardiac intervention has been postponed during COVID-19-related lockdown between 19 March and 30 April 2020 (n=193). Cox regression was performed to identify predictors of the combined 1-year end point emergency cardiovascular hospitalisation and death. All patients undergoing non-emergency interventions in the corresponding time period 2019 served as control group (n=216).

resultsThe combined end point of death and emergency cardiovascular hospitalisation occurred in 70 (36.3%) of 193 patients with a postponed cardiovascular intervention. The planned intervention was deferred by a median of 23 (19-36) days. Arterial hypertension (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.00 to 5.12; p=0.049), chronic kidney disease (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.03 to 3.49; p=0.041) as well as severe valvular heart disease (HR 3.08; 95% CI 1.68 to 5.64; p<0.001) were independent predictors of death or emergency hospitalisation. Kaplan-Maier estimators of the combined end point were 31% in patients with arterial hypertension, 56% in patients with severe valvular heart disease and 77% with both risk factors (HR 12.4, 95% CI 3.8 to 40.7; p<0.001) and only 9% in patients without these risk factors (log rank p<0.001). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) cut-point of ≥1109 pg/mL best predicts the occurrence of primary end point event in deferred patients (area under the curve 0.71; p<0.001; sensitivity 63.8%, specificity 69.4%).

conclusionOur results suggest that patients with either arterial hypertension, chronic kidney or severe valvular heart disease are at very high risk for emergency hospitalisation and increased mortality in case of postponed cardiac interventions even in supposed stable clinical status. Risk seems to be even higher in patients suffering from a combination of these conditions. If the ongoing or future pandemics force hospitals again to postpone cardiac interventions, the biomarker NT-proBNP is an applicable parameter for outpatient monitoring to identify those at risk for adverse cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

COVID-19Heart Valve DiseasesHypertensionCase-Control StudiesCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsRisk Assessmentacute coronary syndromeCOVID-19epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID37460272
PMCPMC10357302
OpenAlexW4384501651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.