ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023
Improving Compound-Protein Interaction Prediction by Self-Training with Augmenting Negative Samples.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable framework applying protein words to predict protein-small molecule complementary pairing rules.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Empowering federated learning for robust compound-protein interaction prediction across heterogeneous cross-pharma domains.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Transforming drug discovery: the impact of AI and molecular simulation on R&D efficiency.BioanalysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying compound-protein interactions (CPIs) is crucial for drug discovery. Since experimentally validating CPIs is often time-consuming and costly, computational approaches are expected to facilitate the process. Rapid growths of available CPI databases have accelerated the development of many machine-learning methods for CPI predictions. However, their performance, particularly their generalizability against external data, often suffers from a data imbalance attributed to the lack of experimentally validated inactive (negative) samples. In this study, we developed a self-training method for augmenting both credible and informative negative samples to improve the performance of models impaired by data imbalances. The constructed model demonstrated higher performance than those constructed with other conventional methods for solving data imbalances, and the improvement was prominent for external datasets. Moreover, examination of the prediction score thresholds for pseudo-labeling during self-training revealed that augmenting the samples with ambiguous prediction scores is beneficial for constructing a model with high generalizability. The present study provides guidelines for improving CPI predictions on real-world data, thus facilitating drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.