Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37459341›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Social presence and dynamics of group communication: An analysis of a health professionals WhatsApp group chats.

Chidozie E Mbada, Oluwatosin O Jeje, Micheal Akande, Kikelomo A Mbada, Clara Fatoye, David Olakorede, Olusola Awoniyi, Udoka A C Okafor, Olatomiwa Falade, Francis Fatoye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Chidozie E MbadaDepartment of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3666-7432
Oluwatosin O JejeDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Micheal AkandeDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Kikelomo A MbadaSchool of Digital Education, Faculty of Learning and Teaching, Arden University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Clara FatoyeDepartment of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
David OlakoredeDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Olusola AwoniyiDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Udoka A C OkaforDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, University of Lagos, Ikeja, Nigeria.
Olatomiwa FaladeRoyal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.
Francis FatoyeDepartment of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Obafemi Awolowo University · NGManchester Metropolitan University · GBArden University · GBRoyal Oldham Hospital · GBUniversity of Lagos · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WhatsApp has become a medium of communication with the potential of promoting collaborative environment with peers, patients and general population. Till date, no analysis of professional WhatsApp groups' activities exists in physiotherapy. The official WhatsApp group chats of the Association of Clinical and Academic Physiotherapists of Nigeria (ACAPN) was analyzed. A total of 20760 chats were gleaned from July 2020 to June 2021. Videos, audios and emoticons were excluded in the analysis. Administrative permission to conduct was obtained from ACAPN leadership. Two consenting physiotherapists who had never deleted their ACAPN group chats shared and exported all chats to a Gmail. The social presence theory for group communication was used as the framework of analysis. Thematic content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. Descriptive statistics of frequency and percentages were used to summarize data. Based on social presence theory classifications, interactive messages (64.5%) followed by cohesive messages (30%) were predominant. Members used the platform more for expression of emotions affectively (100%), referring explicitly to others' messages interactively (56.6%) and for greetings (phatic and salutation) cohesively (61.8%). Qualitative themes indicate that all three categories of social presence theory communications were present sufficiently with interactive category being the most common, as members used the WhatsApp platform to interact, construct and share knowledge. Group WhatsApp platform is a veritable means of communication and an indicator of level of social presence among Nigerian physiotherapists. Communication among Nigerian physiotherapists is mostly interactive, then cohesive and affective in terms of dynamics.

Indexed as

MedicineMobile ApplicationsCommunicationHumansNigeria

Identifiers

PMID37459341
PMCPMC10351686
OpenAlexW4384500725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.