Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37458961›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

Measuring context that matters: validation of the modular Tele-QoL patient-reported outcome and experience measure.

Klara Greffin, Holger Muehlan, Neeltje van den Berg, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Oliver Ritter, Michael Oeff, Sven Speerfork, Georg Schomerus, Silke Schmidt

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Klara Greffin *Department of Psychology, Chair of Health and Prevention, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. klara.greffin@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0947-6091
Holger Muehlan *Department of Psychology, Chair of Health and Prevention, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8048-5682
Neeltje van den BergSection Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6965-0544
Wolfgang HoffmannSection Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6359-8797
Oliver RitterDepartment of Cardiology, Nephrology and Pulmonology, Campus Clinic Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2069-4364
Michael OeffBrandenburg City Hospital, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Sven SpeerforkClinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Georg SchomerusClinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-463X
Silke SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, Chair of Health and Prevention, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4194-1937

Funding

German Innovation Fund 01VSF16027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA setting-sensitive instrument for assessing Quality of Life (QoL) in Telemedicine (TM) was unavailable. To close this gap, a content-valid "add-on" measure was developed. In parallel, a brief index was derived featuring six items that summarise the main content of the multidimensional assessment. After pre- and pilot-testing, the psychometric performance of the final measures was investigated in an independent validation study.

methodsThe questionnaires were applied along with other standardised instruments of similar concepts as well as associated, yet disparate concepts for validation purposes. The sample consisted of patients with depression or heart failure, with or without TM (n = 200). Data analyses were aimed at calculating descriptive statistics and testing the psychometric performance on item, scale, and instrument level, including different types of validity and reliability.

resultsThe proposed factor structure of the multidimensional Tele-QoL measure has been confirmed. Reliability coefficients for internal consistency, split-half, and test-retest reliability of the subscales and index reached sufficient values. The Tele-QoL subscales and the index demonstrated Rasch scalability. Validity of both instruments can be assumed. Evidence for discriminant construct validity was provided. Known-groups validity was indicated by respective score differences for various classes of disease severity.

conclusionBoth measures show convincing psychometric properties. The final multidimensional Tele-QoL assessment consists of six outcome scales and two impact scales assessing (un-)intended effects of TM on QoL. In addition, the Tele-QoL index provides a short alternative for outcome assessment. The Tele-QoL measures can be used as complementary modules to existing QoL instruments capturing healthcare-related aspects of QoL from the patients' perspective.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesDigital healthPatient-reported outcome measureQuality of lifeTelehealthTelemedicineValidation

Identifiers

PMID37458961
PMCPMC10522723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.