Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37458916›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Agreement between cardiac output estimation with a wireless, wearable pulse decomposition analysis device and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients.

Ashish K Khanna, Julio O Garcia, Amit K Saha, Lynnette Harris, Martin Baruch, R Shayn Martin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashish K KhannaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Section on Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. akhanna@wakehealth.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8418-3929
Julio O GarciaWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Amit K SahaPerioperative Outcomes and Informatics Collaborative (POIC), Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Lynnette HarrisPerioperative Outcomes and Informatics Collaborative (POIC), Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Martin BaruchCaretaker Medical, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
R Shayn MartinDepartment of Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USCharlottesville Medical Research · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR001421 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, DAVID P · 2015 to 2023
$5.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePulse Decomposition Analysis (PDA) uses integration of the systolic area of a distally transmitted aortic pulse as well as arterial stiffness estimates to compute cardiac output. We sought to assess agreement of cardiac output (CO) estimation between continuous pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) guided thermodilution (CO-CCO) and a wireless, wearable noninvasive device, (Vitalstream, Caretaker Medical, Charlottesville, VA), that utilizes the Pulse Decomposition Analysis (CO-PDA) method in postoperative cardiac surgery patients in the intensive care unit.

methodsCO-CCO measurements were compared with post processed CO-PDA measurements in prospectively enrolled adult cardiac surgical intensive care unit patients. Uncalibrated CO-PDA values were compared for accuracy with CO-CCO via a Bland-Altman analysis considering repeated measurements and a concordance analysis with a 10% exclusion zone.

results259.7 h of monitoring data from 41 patients matching 15,583 data points were analyzed. Mean CO-CCO was 5.55 L/min, while mean values for the CO-PDA were 5.73 L/min (mean of differences +- SD 0.79 ± 1.11 L/min; limits of agreement - 1.43 to 3.01 L/min), with a percentage error of 37.5%. CO-CCO correlation with CO-PDA was moderate (0.54) and concordance was 0.83.

conclusionCompared with the CO-CCO Swan-Ganz, cardiac output measurements obtained using the CO-PDA were not interchangeable when using a 30% threshold. These preliminary results were within the 45% limits for minimally invasive devices, and pending further robust trials, the CO-PDA offers a noninvasive, wireless solution to complement and extend hemodynamic monitoring within and outside the ICU.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresPulmonary ArteryAdultCardiac OutputCatheterization, Swan-GanzCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsReproducibility of ResultsThermodilutionCardiac outputCardiac surgeryHemodynamicsIntensive care unitMonitoringPostoperativePulse decomposition analysisWireless

Identifiers

PMID37458916
OpenAlexW4384558647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.