Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37458874›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions.

Meghan Tipre, Claudia Hardy, Tara Bowman, Marcus Glover, Patricia Gullet, Denise Baity, Kathy Levy, Monica L Baskin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unequal paths to care: a scoping review of access and cancer outcomes in Alabama.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meghan TipreDivision of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. met169@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0859-6024
Claudia HardyDivision of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Tara BowmanO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Marcus GloverO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Patricia GulletO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Denise BaityO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Kathy LevyO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Monica L BaskinDivision of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35-70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-five men brainstormed and generated 41 unique ideas in response to a single prompt. Participants (n = 70) sorted ideas into groups and rated them in terms of importance and feasibility to change opinions. Multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Participants (n=50) discussed visual concept maps during three focus-groups and recommended solutions to address key barriers. The mean age of respondents was 52 (±10), 50% were rural, 37% were college-educated, 56% with income <$44,500, and 22% with PROCASE Knowledge Index ≤5. Cluster analyses revealed eight clusters. Participants ranked barriers grouped under "fear of consequences of test," "lack of knowledge," and "costs/no insurance" as most important to improve PCS among AA men. The same three clusters along with "dislike for digital rectal exam (DRE)" were ranked as most difficult to change. No major differences were noted by urban/rural status. Solutions to address barriers included education at a younger age, alternate testing options and open discussion about DRE, and clear and precise messaging by peers and relatable role models. Our study identified specific barriers to PCS among AA with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds. Culturally sensitive interventions delivered by trained healthcare professionals, peers, and relatable role models, can potentially increase PCS among AA men.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsBlack or African AmericanEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMass ScreeningProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenAfrican American or Black menConcept mappingDeep SouthProstate cancerRuralScreeningUrban

Identifiers

PMID37458874
OpenAlexW4384524526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.