ArticleActa biotheoretica2023
Assessment of the Global Variance Effective Size of Subdivided Populations, and Its Relation to Other Effective Sizes.
Article in Acta biotheoretica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent population history in Swedish cattle breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The variance effective population size ([Formula: see text]) is frequently used to quantify the expected rate at which a population's allele frequencies change over time. The purpose of this paper is to find expressions for the global [Formula: see text] of a spatially structured population that are of interest for conservation of species. Since [Formula: see text] depends on allele frequency change, we start by dividing the cause of allele frequency change into genetic drift within subpopulations (I) and a second component mainly due to migration between subpopulations (II). We investigate in detail how these two components depend on the way in which subpopulations are weighted as well as their dependence on parameters of the model such a migration rates, and local effective and census sizes. It is shown that under certain conditions the impact of II is eliminated, and [Formula: see text] of the metapopulation is maximized, when subpopulations are weighted proportionally to their long term reproductive contributions. This maximal [Formula: see text] is the sought for global effective size, since it approximates the gene diversity effective size [Formula: see text], a quantifier of the rate of loss of genetic diversity that is relevant for conservation of species and populations. We also propose two novel versions of [Formula: see text], one of which (the backward version of [Formula: see text]) is most stable, exists for most populations, and is closer to [Formula: see text] than the classical notion of [Formula: see text]. Expressions for the optimal length of the time interval for measuring genetic change are developed, that make it possible to estimate any version of [Formula: see text] with maximal accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.