ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Cardiac magnetic resonance for the early prediction of reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A contrast-enhanced CMR-based risk score integrating microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial hemorrhage extent for prognostic evaluation.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Infarct Zone Circumferential Strain Independently Predicts Left Ventricular Functional Recovery After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multiparametric CMR Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An interpretable radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting reverse left ventricular remodeling in STEMI patients using late gadolinium enhancement of myocardial scar.European radiology · 2025Article
- [A cardiac magnetic resonance-based risk prediction model for left ventricular adverse remodeling following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multi-center prospective study].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the changes in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characteristics and investigate the predictors of reverse left ventricular remodeling (r-LVR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsEighty-six STEMI patients (median 56 years) were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into r-LVR and without r-LVR groups. CMR analysis included LV volume, infarct characteristics, and global and regional myocardial function. The strain and displacement were assessed by CMR-feature tracking. The predictors of r-LVR were analyzed by the logistic regression method.
resultsThere were 37 patients in the r-LVR group and 49 patients in the without r-LVR group. At initial CMR, there was no difference in LV volume and global cardiac function between the two groups. However, the infarct zone radial and longitudinal displacements were higher in the r-LVR group (p < 0.05, respectively). At the second CMR, the r-LVR group showed higher LVEF, lower LV volume, and total enhanced mass (all p < 0.05). The infarct zone radial and circumferential strains and radial displacement were higher in the r-LVR group (all p < 0.05). The r-LVR group had better recovery of myocardial injury and function. Of note, microvascular obstruction (MVO) mass (odds ratio: 0.779 (0.613-0.989), p = 0.041) and infarct zone peak longitudinal displacement (PLD) (odds ratio: 1.448 (1.044-2.008), p = 0.026) were independent predictors of r-LVR.
conclusionsAt initial CMR, there were no differences in global cardiac function between the two groups, but infarct zone displacements were higher in the r-LVR group. The r-LVR group had better recovery of cardiac function. In addition, MVO mass and infarct zone PLD were independent predictors of r-LVR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our study assessed changes in cardiac structure, function, and tissue characteristics after STEMI by CMR, investigated the best predictors of r-LVR in STEMI patients, and laid the foundation for the development of new parameter-guided treatment strategies for STEMI patients. KEY POINTS: • At initial CMR, the reverse left ventricular remodeling (r-LVR) group had less myocardial damage and higher infarct zone displacement, but there were no differences in global function between the two groups. • Both groups showed recovery of myocardial injury and cardiac function over time, but the r-LVR group had less enhanced mass and better cardiac function compared to the without r-LVR group at the second CMR. • Microvascular obstruction mass and infarct zone peak longitudinal displacement by cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking were significant predictors of r-LVR in STEMI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.