ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2023
The severity of renal colic pain: Can it be predicted?
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi complicated by hydronephrosis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Comparing the pain relief effectiveness of intravenous magnesium sulfate and ketorolac versus intravenous morphine and ketorolac for kidney stones.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Renal and Genitourinary Ultrasound Evaluation in Emergency and Critical Care: An Overview.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe aimed to determine whether there was a relationship between the perception of renal colic pain and different psychosocial and physiological factors.
methodsBetween May 2021 and July 2022, we prospectively analyzed 320 patients over the age of 18 who were diagnosed with renal colic occurring unilaterally and secondary to a single kidney stone of any size. Body mass index (BMI), education level, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), somatosensory amplification scale (SAS), and the visual analog scale (VAS) features of stone (diameter, Hounsfield value, and localization) and degree of hydronephrosis were analyzed. Correlation analysis of VAS score and these parameters were completed with Spearman's test. The regression analysis was used to determine the predictive factors of severe pain.
resultsThere was no significant difference found between sex and VAS scores of colic pain (p=0.122). We found a significant correlation between VAS score and localization of kidney stone, degree of hydronephrosis, and anxiety level of patients. High grade of hydronephrosis and high anxiety level were found to be associated with high VAS scores (p<0.001 and p=0.035, respectively). It was shown that SAS and level of depression did not correlate with pain. Only a high degree of hydronephrosis was found to be a predictive factor for severe pain (p<0.01).
conclusionsThe patient's high anxiety level and a high degree of hydronephrosis were positively correlated with renal colic pain caused by kidney stones. With this study, the severity of pain in patients with a high degree of hydronephrosis and high anxiety can be predicted and may be a criteria to select suitable treatment to reach faster response.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.