Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37458740›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2023

A prospective evaluation of patient perspectives and financial considerations during prostate cancer treatment decision-making.

Karnvir S Rai, Uday Mann, Oksana Harasemiw, Navdeep Tangri, Amanda Eng, Premal Patel, Jasmir G Nayak

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karnvir S RaiRady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Uday MannSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Oksana HarasemiwChronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Navdeep TangriChronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Amanda EngDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Premal PatelSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jasmir G NayakSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CAManitoba Health · CASeven Oaks General Hospital · CAUrology Team · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn universal healthcare systems, patients may still encounter financial obstacles from cancer treatments, potentially influencing treatment decision-making. We investigated the relationship between socioeconomic status and treatment decision-making as it pertains to patient values, preferences, and perceived barriers to care for localized prostate cancer.

methodsWe conducted a prospective study of patients undergoing a prostate biopsy for the initial detection of prostate cancer. Sociodemographic variables were collected, with validated instruments used to determine health literacy levels. Patients were divided into two groups using self-reported income; those with a positive identification of prostate cancer underwent additional surveys to ascertain their knowledge of their diagnosis, treatment-related preferences, and socioeconomic barriers to care. Descriptive statistics were used.

resultsOf 160 patients, approximately one-third were classified as having low health literacy. Within the low-income group, education levels were lower (34.6% had less than high school education vs. 10.2% in the high-income group) and unemployment rates higher (75.0% unemployed vs. 38.9% in the high-income group). Low-income patients with prostate cancer placed greater importance on indirect out-of-pocket expenses related to treatment (78.3% vs. 33.3%, p=0.001), higher emphasis on treatment-related travel time (50% vs. 15.1%, p=0.004), and more often had difficulty paying for healthcare services in the past (30.9% vs. 9.1%, p=0.02).

conclusionsPatients with lower household incomes have unique treatment values and decision-making preferences. They may experience additional challenges and barriers to obtaining cancer care, at least partly related to indirect costs. These findings should be considered when framing prostate cancer treatment discussions and designing patient-facing health information.

Identifiers

PMID37458740
PMCPMC10544398
OpenAlexW4384069218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.